Status: Pissed
Music: In God’s Hands - Nelly Furtado
I’m a little ticked off. Earlier today, while killing time with a friend at an open-air cafe, a young beggar approached us and asked for money. Being myself that time, I firmly said no, despite the kid’s persistence. My friend was appalled and dismayed by my firmness in not sparing the poor kid some coins. But you know, I’m just not the type who gives alms to paupers on the streets. So my friend just kept on saying not-so-nice things to me while gorging on some chocolate cake and drinking coffee. And I could stand it until he called me an arrogant anti-poor prick. That hit home.
Okay. So I don’t give alms. So what? Does that make me a bad person? Does that automatically mean that I don’t have a heart for the poor? For starters, the primary reason I don’t give money, not a single coin, to wandering kids is because I don’t want them to get used to it. Is it for me? No. It’s for them. What harm will it bring me if I spare them a few bucks? None. But it will harm them. By giving them money, they’d think they could just continue what they are doing running around on the streets begging for money. Does that make me arrogant?
The last time I spared a beggar some bucks was when I was still in Grade shool. There was a beggar in front of a store just beside our school. He looked terrible. And sure, I gave him 20 pesos because I thought he was hungry or thirsty. Maybe he was. But what did he use the money I’d given him for? He bought a pack of cigarettes — while I was still there in front of him, thinking I would’ve bought a tuna sandwich for myself. And it made me feel really bad, and I swore it would never happen again.
And besides, since then, I’ve always believed that charity is something done in the right places. Yes. I may not be giving those poor people money but I help them in ways that I know are effective. My friends don’t know about this but I visit orphanages twice a year with my old books, toys, clothes and some food. My friends never wondered why I never brought a single shirt for our organisation’s rummage sale. But I guess I was just being arrogant.
My friend also mentioned this one time when I refused to eat the food that a small-time carinderia in a slum area served me. I refused to eat not because it’s the poor men’s food but simply a matter of sanitation and health. I saw the man who brought the food to our table got out of the restroom and did not wash his hands. Were I in a gourmet restaurant and saw the waiter doing the same, I would still not eat it. I watch everything I put in my mouth.
Yes, I may be pro-middle class. But it doesn’t mean I’m anti-poor. If sometimes, my political views are a little elitist, it’s for the benefit of everyone, and not just the bourgeoisie and definitely not just the elite. Yep, sometimes I question the poor’s decision-making capabilities. The educated should always lead the uneducated to the right path. That’s what my view has always been. I can’t bear to see, say, Lito Lapid be the President and bastardise everything good left in this country just because we weren’t responsible enough to think before filling out those damn ballots. But after the recent elections, I’m proud that we have all become mature as a people. And my views are beginning to change.
If I refuse to tackle poverty in the screenplays I write, it’s because I don’t like prostituting that condition of this nation to the international audience. You see, Filipino films that win in foreign film festivals all deal with poverty. I have no problem with that. That’s what they like. I have my own thing. The subjects I usually write about are problems experienced by the middle class. That’s closer to my heart. And there have been too many people focusing on the problems of the lower class in the movies. I sympathise with the poor. But it’s not something I will preoccupy myself with because there are other problems that need attention. And I never really liked socially-relevant movies. I like the psychological ones. Those that deal with humanity and not society. And what’s wrong with having the spotlight on the middle class? I mean, we’re the ones paying taxes.
And yes, I avoid going to slum and squatters’ areas. I mean, come on, blame me! I was mugged once. Three people pointed a knife at my bladder. Who won’t be pissed? (pun intended) Who won’t be bothered by the idea that you would lose your life just because those people wanted your mobile phone and it wasn’t even a Nokia N-series phone? Who won’t be traumatised when that experience had haunted you for months and even in your dreams, it wouldn’t leave you? Who wouldn’t hate the fact that your life was in the hands of people who made a living out of threatening to kill you? And that you almost lost it?
But hey, who cares? I’m an arrogant prick, anyway.


Wow, you certainly are one of the very few bloggers I’ve come across that stick to their guns. And then back it up of course. I’m glad you have good reason (from experience) for not handing out money to homeless people. Giving alms should be done through proper organizations, or church or something right? I mean, if you give money to a person on the street, like you said, who knows what they’re gonna do with it! (drugs.) If someone constantly badgered me, Id probably go to like, mcd’s (or somewhere healthier) and buy them actual food.
The people that piss me off the most, are those guys who walk around the bus stop, or go into subway, or mcd’s or whatever and hand out their stupid flyers that say “im deaf, please buy this flyer from me for $5″. WTF. AHHHH
i’m with you. giving alms should be done through the proper channels. giving money to random people on the street won’t help much. they’ll just stay there and they won’t do anything to help themselves.
yep! that’s exactly my point. why cant they understand that?!
although i seem to understand your point, i guess your assertion is just based on an observation and the experience you had with regard to giving alms to streetchildren. You are generalizing poverty. Are you sure that all those children are just using the money given to them in buying cigarettes, betting in kara y krus, or perhaps in purchasing solvents and rugbies? Of course not. We all get guilty. Everyone is. Nothing wrong with not giving alms because you doubt their sincerity but asserting that all people living in urban settlement are muggers, snatchers, or dirty freaks is a different thing. And bragging your occasional support and visit to orphanages makes your point a bit misleading, if not contradictory.
I know I’m being self-righteous, I’m not doing those things I just said, but i guess this ‘reality’ will always be present if voicing out opinions will be the only thing that prevail.
And of course, you’r not an arrogant, anti-poor prick. You are a well-mannered, dogmatic human being.
Peace tayo ES. Hehe.
I have my own rules for me. I don’t give alms to kids and teenagers because they have strength to work. I only give a little alms to very very old women who are unable to stand on their feet. Anyway you’re not an arrogant anti-poor prick
You shouldn’t give a damn what your friends say to you. Maybe they are just kidding.
Exactly. I am not sure. And because I am not sure, I choose not to give alms because they MIGHT do any or some of the things you enumerated. I’d rather do nothing than do more harm.
I never said that. I only mentioned the mugging incident to explain why I AVOID going to squatters’ areas. Thinking that they are ALL criminals doesnt necessarily follow.
I mentioned my occasional visit to orphanages to show that one can help in other ways than giving alms on the streets. And you can call it bragging. But tell you what, I wasn’t.
I deffinitely understand where you’re coming from. I always fear that if I give money to people, they’ll use it on the wrong things. I don’t give money either, but I have once. and that’s great that you give to orphanages. that’s more than what a lot of people do.
I couldn’t agree with you more. I don’t give beggars money, especially here, because I know what they’re using it for. The fact that I see them later in the day with a brown paper bag just sickens me. We’ve got quite a problem where I live with homeless people and I’ve just been at the end of my charity and pity for them (unless they really look as if they have nowhere else to go, which is rarely the case). As for the slums, I prefer not to go to places like that for my own safety. I know that many of the people there are harmless, but not everyone is. If they were there wouldn’t be so many problems in the world.
I don’t give away a lot of money to beggars when I come across them (which is basicly never because I live in a really small town) but in the biggest cities of Sweden they have a good thing going on. There’s a magazine sold by homeless people and 50% of the incomes from the magazine goes to the organization printing it (which works with shelters and such) and 50% to the person selling the magazine. And the people selling the magazine must be drug and alcohol free so they test them and if they do drugs they’re not allowed to sell the magazine anymore. I always give money to those people because then I at least know that they won’t buy drugs for the money.
But doing nothing also is worse than doing something even if you know, of course you’re not sure, that it will harm them. After all, the worst thing that you can ever do to a person is to ignore them, right?
I do understand where you are coming at. I just feel that you’re generalizations are quite offensive. Not that I’m offended immensely, though just a little I must say, for reasons that I get along with these people.
Be careful with stereotyping. And pardon my use of the word bragging. It’s sort of “intensifying an assertion.”
Sorry, the first paragraph is a mess. This one’s better:
But doing nothing is worse than doing something even that will harm them. Of course you are not sure if it will really harm them but at least you took the risk. After all, the worst thing that you can ever do to a person is to ignore them, right?
Chard, you’re my friend. you know that. BUT I just dont get why you keep on saying “generalisations.”
I recognise the fact that NOT ALL poor people are muggers or dirty, or use money for drugs or cigarettes. But that’s exactly the point. Since it is also a fact that some of them are, why would I (what’s your word? — aha!) risk making their situations worse by giving them money WHEN i have my own way of helping them in which I am so sure that whatever I give goes to the right places.
of course, ES, i’m not saying that i don’t know you as a person (i’m not certain if i REALLY know you as far as the range of the word KNOW goes) but it’s what you wrote that i would like to understand.
given that it’s not a generalisation (so you want a British spelling, right?), i’m sure that you have reservations as well. and this is not to speak of only poor people, but people in general.
your point is valid, as far as bourgeois-thinking a la luis bunuel is concerned. but in my opinion, nothing’s wrong with giving alms. isn’t this more of a ‘reality’ rather than an isolated situation?
oh well, je suis desolé, i think i’m out of wit. pardon my discombobulation. see you.